Supreme CourtFull Bench(1984) 04 SC CK 0020

N.L. Abhyankar and Others vs Union of India and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 24 April 1984 · Citation: AIR 1984 SC 1247 : (1984) 32 BLJR 390 : (1984) 49 FLR 354 : (1984) LabIC 955 : (1984) 1 SCALE 649 : (1984) 3 SCC 125 : (1984) 3 SCR 552 : (1984) 2 SLJ 66 : (1984) 16 UJ 817

HON’BLE JUDGES
O. Chinnappa Reddy, J · E. S. Venkataramiah, J · A. N. Sen, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petitions (Civil) No''s. 3551 to 3534, 4831 to 4833 and 13243 of 1983

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 219 words

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.—In view of our decision in Union of India Vs. Bidhubhushan Malik and Others, and for the reasons mentioned by the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No. 3281 of 1979 dated 2.3.1983 in the case of Bidhubhushan Malik and Ors. v. Union of India, which we have accepted as correct in SLP No. 9616 of 1983 just now dismissed by us we allow the writ petitions. The Judges of the High Court and of the Supreme Court will be entitled to the pensionary benefits under the amended Act of 1976 irrespective of the dates of their retirement. They will be so entitled with effect from 1.10.1974. Arrears of pension calculated under the provisions of the new Act will be paid to those to whom it is due within four months from today. In the case of Judges who have died after 1.10.1974 the amounts due will be paid to the legal heirs of the Judges within four months from today. The family pension due to the widows will be calculated under the provisions of the 1976 Amending Act and paid to them. Ad-hoc payments made, if any, will be adjusted while making such payments. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. What we have said about pensionary benefits does not apply to payment of gratuity.