High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 RAJ CK 0036

Nizamudeen S/o Late Mohammed Khan vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 8 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Mehta
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
2827 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 318 words
1.

The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India seeking grant of retiral benefits. It is

contended by the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

that the matter stands settled by a judgment rendered in Daulat

Ram V/s Chairman & Managing Director, Rajasthan State

Road Transport Corporation & Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition

No.9687/2015) decided on 01.10.2015, therefore, the present

writ petition can be disposed of in the light of aforesaid judgment.

2.

Heard.

3.

Issue notice. Mr.Harish Purohit who is present in the court

today is directed to accept accept the notices on behalf of the

respondent Corporation. Let two sets of the writ petition be served

upon the counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent

Corporation. Learned counsel for the respondent- Corporation has

not been able to distinguish the facts of the present case to that of

Daulat Ram''s case (Supra).

4.

I have perused the record of the case and find that the

dispute raised in the present writ petition is no longer res-integra.

5.

This court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra)

directed as under:-

"In this background, these petitions deserve to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. From the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to the concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest. No order as to costs."

6.

In view of above, this writ petition is also allowed in the

same terms as in the judgment rendered in the case of Daulat

Ram (supra). No order as to costs.