High CourtsSingle Bench(1952) 01 SHI CK 0002

Nizamuddin vs State

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 2 January 1952 · Citation: AIR 1952 HP 45

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.P. Choudry, J.C.
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Ref. No. 10 of 1951

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 175 words

Chowdhry, J.C.

1.

This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Bilaspur u/s 438, Criminal P. C., recommending that the conviction of one Nizamuddin under Clauses (a) and (f) of S. 19 of the Arms Act be set aside. The reference has not been opposed by the learned Government Advocate.

2.

As regards the offence u/s 19(a), there is no evidence of manufacture and therefore conviction under that section is on the face of it totally unfounded. As regards the conviction u/s 19(f), previous sanction of the District Magistrate was not obtained, as it was necessary to do. "KANHYA v. STATE" A I R 1951 Him P 35. The learned Government Advocate does not contend that that ruling does not apply to Bilaspur by reason of the provisions of S. 32(2) of Act XXXI (31) of 1861 having ever been applied to this State.

3.

The reference is accepted and the conviction and sentence of Nizamuddin are set aside and he is acquitted. The fine, if already realised, shall be refunded to him.