High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 09 CHH CK 0221

Nitu Shrivastava vs Branch Manager, State Bank Of India And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 12 September 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (227) No. 787 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 193 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

By the impugned order dated 23.08.2018, the petitioner / plaintiff's opportunity to lead evidence has been closed by the trial Court on the ground that

petitioner appeared before the Court on the date fixed for evidence i.e. on 24.07.2018 and 23.08.2018 at about 4.45 pm, against which this writ petition

has been preferred.

2.

I have heard petitioner in person.

3.

It appears that though petitioner appeared before the Court on 24.07.2018 & 23.08.2018 at later part of the day but that cannot be a ground to

foreclose the opportunity of the petitioner to lead evidence. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside.

4.

As the case is fixed for tomorrow before the trial Court, the trial Court is directed to record the evidence of petitioner / plaintiff and her witnesses

on 13.09.2018 and petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court at 11.00a.m.

5.

The respondents / defendants would be at liberty to move an application for modification of the order, if they are aggrieved.

6.

AR(J) is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial Court by today itself.

Certified copy today.