High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 KL CK 4892

Nishad vs State Of Kerala & Anr.

High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam · Decided on 29 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J
CASE NUMBER
Bail Appl. No. 5520 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 500 words

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail.

2.

The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.468/2024 of Nattukal Police Station, Palakkad District, which is now pending as S.C. No.73/2025 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge-II, Palakkad. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 22(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that, the applicant, along with two others, was found possessing 5.850 grams of MDMA inside a car bearing number KL 50 F 1564 stationed at a placed called Cheerathadam on the night of 24.09.2024 at 21.10 hours and thereby committed the offences.

4.

I have heard Sri.P.Mohamed Sabah, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.Aneeda Beegum, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6.

The applicant was earlier released on bail on 24.09.2024. Thereafter, he violated the bail condition and went abroad. His bail was cancelled and now, he has surrendered before the trial Court on 01.08.2026. Since then he is in judicial custody. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i)

The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii)

The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii)

The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv)

The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v)

The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi)

The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii)

The applicant shall surrender his passport before the trial Court.

(vii)

The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.