Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2008) 08 SC CK 0026

Nirma Credit and Capital Ltd. vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 8 August 2008 · Citation: (2008) 220 CTR 537 : (2009) 177 TAXMAN 416

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. H. Kapadia, J · B. Sudershan Reddy, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeals Nos. 4984-86 Of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 181 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

The important question which arose before the High Court in the assessee's appeal u/s 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was whether the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation of plant and machinery was not allowable on the ground that the assessee had not manufactured the goods during the previous year. It appears that the operation of the assessee's business stood suspended during the previous year. Assessee claims that despite such suspension of operation assessee was still entitled to claim depreciation on the ground of passive user. This aspect has not been gone into by the High Court on dismissing the asssessee's appeal u/s 260A. In fact no reason whatsoever has been recorded by the High Court on this point.

3.

In the circumstances, we set aside the impugned judgment and remit the matter to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law. We request the High Court, if possible, to dispose of the matter, as early as possible, within six months.

The appeals are disposed of with no order as to costs.