High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 05 TP CK 0001

Niranjan Roy vs State Of Tripura

Tripura High Court · Decided on 1 May 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Aparesh Kumar Singh, CJ · Arindam Lodh, J
CASE NUMBER
IA No.01 Of 2024 In Commercial Appeal No. 01 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 373 words

IA No.01/2024 in Commercial Appeal No.01 of 2024

Respondent has entered appearance on notice through learned Government Advocate Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharyya. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for condonation of delay of 71 days in preferring the instant memo of appeal. The appeal arises out of a judgment dated 12.09.2023 passed by learned Judge, District Commercial Court, West Tripura, Agartala in CM (ARB) 09/2018 whereby the learned Court has rejected the challenge to part of the impugned arbitral award under Section 34(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended. The appeal is under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was engaged in the treatment of his near relative in Chennai and returned in October, 2023. Meanwhile Puja vacation started. Learned counsel for the applicant had also gone to Bangalore for treatment and returned on 6th November, 2023, but he was advised rest. Thereafter, the certified copy of the order was obtained. Steps were taken by the applicant by approaching the learned counsel in this Court for preparing and drafting the memo of appeal. The appeal has been filed with a delay of 71 days which is not deliberate. As such, he submits that even as per the ratio rendered in the case of Government of Maharashtra (Water Resources Department) represented by Executive Engineer v. Borse Brothers Engineers and Contractors Private Limited reported in (2021) 6 SCC 460, the delay is not inordinate beyond the period of 60 days. Therefore, delay may be condoned.

Learned Government Advocate for the respondent-State has opposed the prayer.

However, upon consideration of rival submission of the parties and the explanations urged, we are of the considered view that the delay has been properly explained. The delay is neither inordinate nor deliberate. As such, IA No.01/2024 is allowed.

Commercial Appeal No.01 of 2024

Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to add the relevant provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended in the nomenclature of the instant memo of appeal during course of the day.

Admit.

Call for the lower Court records from the concerned Court.

Office to prepare Paper Book on receipt of the LCRs.

Matter be listed for hearing on 29.05.2024.