Tribunals and CommissionsFull Bench(2024) 02 NGT CK 0029

News item titled "Encroachers remain on lake despite HC fiat" appearing in The Times of India dated 11.01.2024 Vs

National Green Tribunal · Decided on 26 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prakash Shrivastava, CP · Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM · Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 169 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 326 words
1.

This original application has been registered on the basis of the news item titled "Encroachers remain on lake despite HC fiat" appearing in the ‘Times of India’ dated 11.01.2024.

2.

The news item discloses that the Chitlapakkam lake in south Chennai has a water spread of about 53 acres which is now only 47 acres and six acres have been taken over by the encroachers who have built houses on the western side of the lake. The news item further discloses that inspite of the order of the Madras High Court, many of the encroachers have been left untouched and out of 403 identified encroachments, authorities have removed only 74 till date. It further discloses that instead of complying with the order of the Court fully and removing all encroachments, WRD is carrying out restoration work at a cost of 25 crore on the available area, thereby legalizing the encroachments.

3.

The news item raises substantial issue relating to compliance of the environmental norms and enforcement of Scheduled enactments.

4.

Power of the Tribunal to take up the matter in suo-motu has been recognized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of “Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha & Ors.” reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 897.

5.

Hence, we implead the following as respondents in the OA:

i. Water Resource Department, Tamil Nadu, through its Chief Engineer and Director.

ii. Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board through its Member Secretary.

iii. District Collector/District Magistrate, Kanchipuram.

iv. State Wetland Authority through the Member Secretary.

6.

Let Notice be issued to the above Respondents for filing their response before appropriate bench of the Tribunal.

7.

Since the matter relates to the Southern Zonal Bench, Chennai, therefore, OA is transferred to the Southern Zonal Bench for appropriate further action. Let the original record of the OA be transferred to the Southern Zonal Bench, Chennai.

8.

List before Southern Zonal Bench at Chennai on 15.04.2024.