High CourtsDivision Bench(1928) 12 CAL CK 0029

Newaj Ali Molla vs Emperor

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 10 December 1928 · Citation: 118 Ind. Cas. 368

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mukerji, J · Graham, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 143 words
1.

The foundation of the petitioner''s contention in this case is the proposition that the word "person" in Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure includes the accused concerned in the case in respect of which investigation is being held under Chap. XIV of the Code. It is well-known that so far as this matter is concerned the decisions are not uniform. There are difficulties in accepting either view; but having given the matter all the consideration that we can, we are inclined to follow the decision of this Court in the case of Azimaddy and Others Vs. Emperor, in which it has been held that the section applies to witnesses and not to the accused under trial. This being our opinion, the Rule must be discharged. The petitioner, if on bail, must surrender and serve out the rest of his sentence.