High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 12 SHI CK 0049

New Vishal Himachal Goods Parivahan Sahkari Sabha Simit vs State Of H.P And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 8 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sureshwar Thakur, J · Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 5621 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 470 words

Sureshwar Thakur, J

1.

Through Annexure P-3, Election programme, was drawn, for electing the Managing Committee, of the petitioner-society,. The term of the

Managing Committee, as stated at the Bar, by the learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner-society, has expired on 01.12.2020.

2.

The sequel thereof, is qua it becoming incumbent, upon, the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Society concerned, to, ensure the conducting, of, fresh

elections, to, the Managing Committee, of, the petitioner-society.

3.

This Court has perused the order, made upon, CMP No. 3645 of 2020, instituted with in CWP No. 1363 of 2020-G, wherethrough, the order of

supersession, of, the Managing Committee of the petitioner-society, as made, through exercising, of, statutory powers, vested in the Assistant

Registrar concerned, under Section 37 of the Himachal Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1968, (hereinafter referred to as “the Actâ€), hence

became stayed. Obvious consequence thereof is that, the respondents concerned, became barred to appoint an Administrator, to, manage and

lookafter the financial and administrative affairs, of, the Society concerned.

4.

Be that as it may, since as afore stated, it was incumbent, upon, the Assistant Registrar concerned, to, after the expiry of term, of, the Managing

Committee, conduct fresh elections, but, he has, through the impugned order, proceeded to re-draw proceedings, under Section 37 of the Act,

inasmuch as, for superseding the Managing Committee, and also thereafter, has proceeded to appoint an Administrator. The afore powers exercised

by the Assistant Registrar concerned, could not be exercised by him, unless the afore civil writ petition, hence containing a controversy almost similar

to the one, embodied in the impugned order, became affirmatively decided vis-Ã -vis the Managing Committee concerned. Furthermore, the stigmatic

effect of the afore redrawing, of, powers under Section 37 of the Act, is that, the members of the Managing Committee, purportedly incurring the

disqualification to participate in the fresh elections to be conducted thereto.

5.

Consequently, for undoing the afore effects, this Court clarifies that the Assistant Registrar/Returning Officer concerned, shall within two weeks,

ensure that fresh elections are conducted, to the Managing Committee of the Society concerned, and shall also ensure that the Administrator, hence

appointed, under the impugned Annexure(s), shall only function for ensuring the conducting, of, the smooth and streamlined democratic elections, to

the Managing Committee, of, the society concerned, and that he shall not administer, the financial and other administrative affairs, of, the society

concerned. Moreover, in view of the afore, it is also clarified that the participation, non-participation or ineligibility, on any account, of the erstwhile

members of the Managing Committee, to, participate in the fresh elections, to be conducted, shall also be decided through an independent application

of mind, being made, by the Assistant Registrar/Returning Officer concerned. Accordingly, the extant writ petition is disposed of, so also pending

application(s), if any.

Copy dasti.