High CourtsSingle Bench(1924) 01 AHC CK 0048

Nema Singh vs Musammat Kulsum-Un-Nissa

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 16 January 1924 · Citation: 86 Ind. Cas. 392

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mukerji, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 229 words

Mukerji, J.—The respondent-brought a suit for recovery of arrears of rent and included in it a small item which was described as "raqam sawai." It was a claim for Rs. 2-2-3 said to be due on account of weighment fee and bhusa. The Court of first instance dismissed the suit with respect to this ''raqam sawai, but the learned Judge on appeal decreed this portion of the claim. It has been contended that this ''raqam sawai is in the nature of a cess and could not be recoverable, without having been recorded by the Record Officer. But the lower Court finds, and I also find from the evidence of the patwari,'' that a certain amount of money was recorded as payable as ''raqam sawai'' by the tenants, at the last settlement. This disposes of the contention of the appellant on this point. It was next urged that a claim for a cess could not be maintained in the Revenue Court. But the question of jurisdiction does not appear to have been raised in the Courts of first instance. At any rate, when there was an appeal to the learned District Judge who was the Appellate Court for both the Civil and Revenue Courts no question of jurisdiction could be raised in that Court.

2.

The decree of the Court below was right and the appeal is dismissed with costs.