High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 03 AHC CK 0317

Neetu Manish Chaudhari vs State Of U.P. And Another

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 25 March 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Beer Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Application U/S 378 No. - 268 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 196 words

Raj Beer Singh, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant and learned AGA for the State and perused the record. None has appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2 despite service of notice.

2.

This application has been filed under Section 419(4) BNSS seeking leave to file an appeal against judgment and order dated 14.08.2024, passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Court no.2, Bijnor, whereby the opposite party no.2 has been acquitted of charge under Section 138 N.I. Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant submitted that impugned judgment dated 14.08.2024 is against facts and law and thus liable to be quashed. Referring to facts of the matter, it was submitted that there is apparent illegality in the impugned order and thus a case for grant of leave to file appeal is made out.

4.

Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, a case for grant of leave to appeal is made out. Accordingly leave to file the appeal is granted in accordance with the provisions of Section 419(4) BNSS.

5.

Application for leave to appeal is allowed.

6.

List this case on 15.04.2026.