High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 08 CHH CK 0254

Neeraj Kumar vs tate Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 23 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ · Parth Prateem Sahu, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No. 636 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 315 words

Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ

1.

Heard counsel for the parties.

2.

Since the writ application of the appellant was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide his order dated 11/05/2018, the writ appeal has been

preferred by him.

3.

The prayer in the writ application was for a direction upon the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the appellant for appointment on the

post of Assistant Professor, which the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission refused to do. The reason for such rejection was that he did not have

the requisite eligibility.

4.

Argument before the learned Single Judge made on behalf of the appellant was that he has degree in Commerce and MBA which amounts to a

Post Graduation Degree, which is equivalent to M. Com and therefore, he had requisite eligibility to be considered for the post of Assistant Professor.

5.

The minimum eligibility has been laid down by University Grand Commission for appointment on such teaching post a Post Graduation Degree i.e.

M. Com with minimum 55% marks is a must. In this case, the subject in question is Commerce. Since an MBA is not a Post Graduation Decree, but it

is a diploma which is awarded by various institutions. Even though it is called a Master of Business Administration, it is not a post graduate degree, at

par with M. Com, therefore, the Learned Single Judge refused to bite the argument that an MBA degree is good enough to make the appellant eligible

for consideration for appointment on the post of an Assistant Professor.

6.

Since the educational qualification of the appellant is not a subject matter of dispute, therefore, the benefit which he expects by way of a direction

by the Court cannot be granted.

7.

There is no infirmity in the order of learned Single Judge, which requires rectification in appeal. The appeal has no merit and it is dismissed.