High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 10 P&H CK 0074

Neeraj Beri vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 October 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 48292 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 179 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer for speedy decision of petition filed under Section 156 Cr. P.C. before the concerned Magistrate and withdraws the remaining prayer with liberty to file fresh separate petition in this regard.

Given above, this Court requests the Judicial Magistrate to decide the complaint on priority basis.

Qua second prayer, petitioner's counsel submits that he would be contended and satisfied in case representation dated 07.02.2022 Annexure P-2 be decided within time bound manner.

The prayer is not opposed.

Given above, respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Sector 9, Chandigarh, to decide the representation dated 07.02.2022 Annexure P-2 by passing a speaking and reasoned order either himself/herself or by delegating it to some other officer of IPS cadre, within 45 working days from the date of receipt of the representation. The order so passed be communicated to the representationist without any delay.

In case, the grievance of the petitioner still exists, he shall be at liberty to avail legal remedy in accordance with law including approaching this Court.