Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 09 NCLT CK 0629

Nebula Technologies vs Treistek Technologies LLP

National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench · Decided on 27 September 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajeswara Rao Vittanala, Member (Judicial) · Ashok Kumar Mishra, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
C.P.(IB)No.312/BB/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 332 words

Per: Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Member (T)

1.

C.P.(IB)No.312/BB/2019 is filed by Nebula Technologies (hereinafter referred to as ‘Petitioner/Operational Creditor’) U/s 9 of the IBC, 2016, R/w Rule 6 of the I&B(AAA) Rules, 2016, by inter alia seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in respect of Treistek Technologies LLP (hereinafter referred to as ‘Corporate Debtor/Respondent’) on the ground that the Corporate Debtor has committed a default of Rs.25,83,650/- (Rupees Twenty Five Lakhs Eighty Three Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Only).

2.

The case is listed for admission on various dates viz. 20.09.2019, 26.09.2019 & 27.09.2019, and it was adjourned on these dates at the request of party, on one ground, or the other.

3.

Heard Shri Ajai P. Johnson, learned Proxy Counsel for the Petitioner. We have carefully perused the pleadings of the party and provisions of the Code.

4.

The Learned Proxy Counsel for the Petitioner prayed the Adjudicating Authority to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file fresh Company Petition, in case the Petitioner is aggrieved by any cause of action in the future.

5.

The learned Proxy Counsel for the Petitioner has filed a Memo to Withdrawal dated 26.09.2019 (which is taken on record), which reads as under:

"The Petitioner requests the leave of this Hon'ble Tribunal to withdraw the Insolvency Application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with liberty to file fresh Petition."

6.

Since the case is not yet admitted by the Adjudicating Authority, we are inclined to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file fresh Company Petition, in case the Petitioner is aggrieved by any cause of action in the future.

7.

In the result, C.P.(IB)No.312/BB/2019 is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of Memo to Withdrawal dated 26.09.2019, with liberty to the Petitioner to file fresh Company Petition, in case the Petitioner is aggrieved by any cause of action in the future. No order as to costs.