High CourtsDivision Bench(1886) 12 CAL CK 0006

Neaz vs Monsor and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 20 December 1886 · Citation: (1887) ILR (Cal) 175

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Comer Petheram, C.J · Beverley, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 102 words
1.

In this case we are of opinion that u/s 22 of Act I of 1871 the order made by the Deputy Magistrate was a legal order. The matter in which that order was made was not a regular criminal proceeding, but a quasi-civil proceeding, in which a Magistrate is authorized to assess and enforce in a summary manner compensation for an injury for which a civil action might be brought, Under these circumstances we think that, in the present ease, the so-called accused are jointly and severally liable for the compensation and costs awarded, and we see no reason to interfere.