High CourtsSingle Bench(1925) 02 MAD CK 0012

Nawab Sulaiman Alikhan and Others vs Menna Venkatanarayana Garu and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 18 February 1925 · Citation: 91 Ind. Cas. 166

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madhavan Nair, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 222 words

Madhavan Nair, J.—The first defendant is the appellant. He is now dead and his legal representatives have been brought on record.

Plaintiff''s suit was one for contribution against the persons who were along with others, judgment-debtors in O.S. No. 358 of 1904 on the file of

the Court of the Principal District Munsif of Masulipatam. A joint decree was passed against the two defendants by the Court of first instance. On

appeal the Subordinate Judge departed from the usual rule of passing several decrees against the two defendants because he was under the

impression that there was only one judgment-debtor in the said O.S. No. 358 of 1904 and the others were all his legal representatives The report

submitted by the Subordinate Judge shows that on this assumption he was wrong. It follows, therefore, that the joint decree against the two

defendants should not have been passed by the lower Court. So far as the first defendant is concerned the lower Court''s decree is modified and

the plaintiff will get a decree for half the amount against the assets of the first defendant in the hands of his legal representatives. In other respects

the decree of the lower Court, will stand. The parties will pay and receive proportionate costs. The first respondent''s Vakil''s fee in this case is

fixed at Rs. 35.