High CourtsDivision Bench(2005) 03 MAD CK 0082

Navodaya Mass Entertainments Ltd. vs M. Vaidyanathan, Arbitrator (Arbitral Tribunal) and J.M. Combines

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 March 2005 · Citation: (2006) 129 CompCas 697 : (2005) 3 MLJ 131

HON’BLE JUDGES
Markandey Katju, C.J · F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No. 1270 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 221 words

Markandey Katju, C.J.—This writ appeal has been filed against the impugned order of the learned single Judge dated 7.2.2004.

2.

The writ petition was filed praying for a writ of Certiorari against the order of the Arbitrator dated 27.10.2003. By that order, the preliminary objection of the writ petitioner that the proceedings are barred by Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act'') was rejected. The writ petitioner also raised an objection before the Arbitrator that there was no valid agreement for arbitration.

3.

In our view, the writ petition was rightly rejected by the learned single Judge. The learned single Judge has followed the earlier order of this Court in M/s. Mangayarkarasi Apparels Pvt. Ltd. v. Sundaram Finance Limited 2002 (2) CTC 585. We agree with the view taken by the learned single Judge.

4.

Apart from the above, we are of the opinion that Section 22 of the Act has no application as the proceedings before an Arbitrator are not a suit nor are they proceedings for winding up of the industrial company or for execution, distress or the like. Hence Section 22(1) of the Act has no application at all.

5.

There is no force in this appeal and it is dismissed. W.A.M.P. No. 2387 of 2004 is dismissed.