AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner being aggrieved
with the order dated 23.08.2017 passed by the Divisional
Commissioner, Bikaner in appeal No.6/16 preferred on behalf of
the respondent No.2 against the Urban Improvement Trust,
Bikaner.
The Urban Improvement Trust, Bikaner vide order dated
13.10.2016 has stopped the construction activities carried out by
the respondent No.2 on Khasra No.318. Being aggrieved with the
said order dated 13.10.2016 the respondent No.2 has preferred an
appeal before the Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner which is
pending consideration.
In the meantime, the petitioner has filed an application in
the said appeal before the Divisional Commissioner with a prayer
for being impleaded as party in that appeal. The Divisional
Commissioner vide impugned order has dismissed the said
application.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after
going through the impugned order, I do not find any illegality in
the action of the Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner in rejecting the
application filed by the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
Divisional Commissioner has made certain observations which
may affect the final outcome of the appeal preferred by the
respondent No.2. Needless to say that the Divisional
Commissioner while finally deciding the appeal No.6/16 preferred
by the respondent No.2 will not get influenced by the observations
made in the impugned order and will decide the said appeal
strictly in accordance with law on the basis of material available on
record.
With these observations, this writ petition is dismissed.
Stay petition also stands dismissed.
