High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 DEL CK 0128

Naveen Kumar & Ors vs State & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kumar Kait, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 825 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

29 paragraphs · 394 words

Suresh Kumar Kait, J

CRL. M.A. 3384/2020

1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.825/2020

3.

Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 23/2020 dated 13.01.2020, registered at PS — Sector-23,

Dwarka and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

4.

Notice issued.

5.

Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and respondent nos.2 & 3 who are present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.

The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have no objection if the present

petition is allowed.

7.

Complainants/Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are personally present in Court and they have been identified by ASI Karan Singh/IO and submits that matter

has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8.

Petitioners and respondent nos.2 & 3 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Settlement dated 10.02.2020.

9.

Learned APP has opposed the present petition and submits that the case is under section 308 IPC and grievous injury has been caused by iron rod,

therefore, if this Court is inclined to quash FIR, heavy cost may be imposed upon petitioners.

10.

Petitioner no.1 is doing laundry works, petitioner no.2 is a conductor in DTC and petitioner no.3 is a law student from MD University. Therefore, I

refrain from imposing cost on petitioner nos.2 & 3, however, counsel for petitioners, submits that petitioner no.1 is ready to contribute Rs. 50,000/- for

welfare purposes. Accordingly, petitioner no.1 is directed to pay this amount in the following manner:-

(a) Rs. 25,000/- in favour of Delhi High Court Advocates’ Welfare Fund.

(b) Rs. 25,000/- in favour of Delhi High Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society.

11.

Petitioner no.1 is further directed to pay this amount within two weeks and receipt of the same shall be furnished to IO concerned.

12.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any

further.

13.

For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 23/2020 dated 13.01.2020, registered at PS — Sector-23, Dwarka and consequent proceedings

emanating therefrom are quashed.

14.

The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

15.

Order dasti