High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 11 DEL CK 0841

National Financial Reporting Authority vs Akeel Master

Delhi High Court · Decided on 17 November 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J · Tara Vitasta Ganju, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
LPA 113/2021 & LPA 116/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 357 words

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL)

LPA 113/2021 & CM APPL. 10590/2021 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking interim relief] &

LPA 116/2021 & CM APPL. 10628/2021 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking interim relief]

1.

These appeals are directed against a common order dated 16.12.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge.

2.

The operative directions passed by the learned Single Judge read as follows: -

“Having considered the submissions made, as an interim order, it is directed that the respondent may proceed with the Show Cause Notice issued to the petitioner(s) in W.P.(C) 10446/2020 and W.P.(C) 10448/2020, however, any order passed in such proceedings shall not be given effect to, including its publication on the website, without seeking prior approval of this Court.

In case the respondent takes a decision before the next date of hearing, the respondent shall be at liberty to approach this Court seeking variation of this order, if so advised.”

3.

It is not in dispute, that the writ petition is pending before the learned Single Judge.

3.1

Therefore, the merits of the matter are yet to be adjudicated by the learned Single Judge.

4.

It is our opinion, that the aforesaid direction, at the interlocutory stage, preserves the status quo and rights of the parties till such time the writ petitions are adjudicated.

5.

We may add, that as permission has been given to continue the proceedings, the interim direction will hasten the proceedings before the appellant, and at the same time preserve the rights of the respondents, as a direction has been issued that the order passed will neither be given effect to, nor will the same be publicized.

6.

We make it clear, that continuation of the proceedings would be subject to all legal rights that may be available to the respondents.

7.

Therefore, at this stage, we are not inclined to interdict the proceedings.

8.

The above-captioned appeals are, accordingly, disposed of along with pending applications.

9.

Needless to add, the disposal of the appeals will neither affect the rights nor contentions of the parties that they may wish put forth before the learned Single Judge.