High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 02 RAJ CK 0035

Nathu Ram S/o Shri Banshidhar vs Manguram S/o Late Shri Mahadev Ji

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 6 February 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
CASE NUMBER
5649 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

34 paragraphs · 324 words
1.

The matter has been listed from the defect side in view of

the fact that name of the appellant does not tally with the

description of the parties in the cause title.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that

though he is seeking vacation of the order dated 25 th February,

2015, but application of the appellant/applicant, seeking

impleadment to the suit proceedings that was instituted on 3 rd

May, 2016, is yet to be adjudicated upon.

3.

Learned counsel would submit that application of the

applicant has not been dealt with and adjudicated upon as yet for

time was allowed to the plaintiff to file his response, posting the

matter to 9th July, 2016, and thereafter, to 24th August, 2016.

4.

According to the learned counsel, the application seeking

impleadment of the applicant is not being adjudicated upon by the

trial Court whereas the order dated 25 th February, 2015, is

operating adverse to his interest.

5.

Heard and considered.

6.

The instant appeal proceedings instituted by the applicant

while he has not been impleaded as a party to the suit

proceedings; cannot be sustained.

7.

Needless to observe that the applicant would make his

efforts to have an adjudication by the Court below on the

application seeking impleadment as party to the suit proceedings.

The Court below is expected to adjudicate upon the application for

impleadement as expeditiously as possible, however, in no case

later than two months from the date a certified copy of this order,

is presented.

8.

It is made clear that this Court is not adjudicated upon the

legality or validity of order dated 25th February, 2015.

9.

It will be open for the applicant to avail of legal remedy, in

accordance with law, consequent upon adjudication of his

application pending impleadment, if so advised.

10.

With the observations and direction as indicated above, the

civil misc. appeal as well as the stay application stand closed.