High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 02 DEL CK 0511

Nasima Khatoon vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 21 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1658 Of 2018, Civil Miscellaneous No. 6824-25 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 180 words

Rajiv Shakdher, J

1.

This is a writ petition, whereby, challenge is laid to order dated 28.11.2017, passed by the SDM, Seelampur.

2.

Record shows that ICICI Lombard has obtained the impugned attachment order. The attachment order is directed against the son of the petitioner.

The petitioner, who is the mother, claims to be the owner of the subject property. The ownership claim is based on a General Power of Attorney.

According to the petitioner, the said Power of Attorney is registered.

3.

A perusal of the Power of Attorney shows that it is executed in favour of the petitioner only to manage, sell, mortgage etcetera, the subject

property. There is no reference to any consideration in the Power of Attorney.

4.

The claim of the petitioner that she has title and is the owner of the property, prima facie, is not made out.

5.

Writ Petition is, accordingly,dismissed.

6.

The petitioner, however, will have liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedies to establish her title and ownership, albeit, in accordance with

law.

7.

Consequently, all pending applications are closed.