High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 09 UK CK 0951

Naseema vs State Of Uttarakhand & Ors.

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 2 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J · Subhash Upadhyay, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (PIL) No.91 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 149 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The present public interest litigation has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent nos.2 to 4 to conduct a joint demarcation, spot inspection and verification of the revenue records of Gram Sabha land comprising of Khasra No.205, Khata No.00428, admeasuring 0.2120 hectare, situated at Village Jorasi Ahatmal, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar and for other ancillary reliefs.

3.

Learned State Counsel, on instructions from the concerned Tehsildar, states that the revenue authorities are taking appropriate measures to remove the unauthorized encroachments and secure the Gram Sabha land.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from his client, also makes the same statement.

5.

As the State-respondents have already initiated action for removal of the encroachments, demarcation and for securing Gram Sabha land, therefore, at this stage, the proceedings are closed.

6.

Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.