Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2015) 07 SC CK 0078

Naseem Ahmed vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 3 July 2015

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil R. Dave, J · V. Gopala Gowda, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 4932 of 2015 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 30676 of 2014)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 211 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

At the request of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the appeal is finally heard today.

3.

Heard the learned Counsel.

4.

It is an admitted fact that Rs. 8,81,085.00 (Rupees Eight Lakhs Eighty One Thousand and Eighty Five only) were payable to the Appellant by the Respondent-Government and the said fact is very clearly admitted in letter dated 14.7.2010, written by the Executive Engineer, Lower Division, East Yamuna Canal, Muzaffarnagar. From the said amount certain deductions are to be made, which are in the nature of certain taxes including business tax, etc.

5.

In view of the fact that the amount had been admitted by the Respondent-Government, we feel that the said amount should be paid without entering into any arbitration, etc. and therefore, the said amount shall be paid to the Appellant within four months from today after deducting taxes etc. and along with the payment, details with regard to the deductions made shall also be given to the Appellant by the Respondent.

6.

In view of the above peculiar facts of the case, so as to avoid further litigation in the nature of arbitration or suit, the impugned judgment is set aside and the appeal is allowed with no order as to costs.