High CourtsSingle Bench(2006) 05 P&H CK 0020

Naresh Rani and Others vs Rakesh Kumar Bansal

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 May 2006 · Citation: (2007) 2 DMC 731

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jasbir Singh, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 181 words

Jasbir Singh, J.—This revision petition has been filed against order dated 21.4.2004, vide which, while deciding application of the petitioner

No. 1 u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, she was granted Rs. 2,500 as litigation amount and Rs. 1,000 per month towards interim

maintenance for her and two children, who are residing with her.

Counsel for the parties heard.

2.

This Court feels that in view of facts on record, the amount awarded is on the lower side. A finding has been given by the trial Court that the

respondent-husband can be presumed to have been earning Rs. 3,000 per month. This finding has not been challenged by the respondent. It has

also come on record and that one child is residing with the respondent and two are living with the wife. So by dividing Rs. 3,000 into five parts, this

Court feels that the petitioner wife is entitled to interim maintenance @ Rs. 1,800 per month from the date of her application. Litigation expenses

are also enhanced from Rs. 2,500 to Rs. 5,000.

Civil Revision stands disposed of.