High CourtsDivision Bench(1906) 07 BOM CK 0015

Narayan Sadashiv vs Nimba Hari Shimpi

Bombay High Court · Decided on 5 July 1906 · Citation: (1906) 8 BOMLR 547

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lawrence Jenkins, J · Beaman, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Application under Extraordinary Jurisdiction No. 24 of 1906

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 81 words

Lawrence Jenkins, K.C.I.E., C.J.—Having regard to the decision in Mackintosh v. Gill (1873) 12 B.L.R. 37 and Anderson v. Kalagarla ILR (1885) 12 Cal 339 and in particular to what is said at pages 342 and 347 of the latter case, we think it clear that the defendant has, in Section 43 of the CPC a complete answer to the plaintiff''s claim.

2.

The rule must, therefore, be made absolute with costs, and the suit will be dismissed with costs throughout.