High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 11 GUJ CK 0038

Naranbhai Umabhai Mali and Another vs Bhikabhai Ratnaabhai Patel and Another

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 18 November 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. S. Jhaveri, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal No. 2494 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 313 words

K.S. Jhaveri, J.—By way of this appeal, the original claimants have claimed for enhancement of the claim amount awarded by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Aux.), Palanpur in MACP No. 165/1995 wherein the claim amount of Rs. 1,50,000/= was fully allowed.

2.

The facts in brief giving rise to this appeal are as under:

On 04.04.1995 at around 10.45 the deceased minor Meenaben was standing on the roadside near her father''s shop in the Bhopanagar area of Deesa Town when truck bearing registration No. GJ 1 U 6373 came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against Meenaben, as a result of which she sustained injuries and succumbed to the same. The deceased Meenaben was 7 years of age and was a student. The parents of the deceased therefore, filed the aforesaid claim application claiming Rs. 1,50,000/= which came to be allowed. The present appeal is for enhancement of compensation.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. S.M. Gohil has submitted that the Tribunal has committed error in deducting one third of the amount from the notional income assigned as if the Multiplier method were to be used and the Appellants would be entitled to a claim amount of Rs. 2,25,000/= as held in the case of Manju Devi v. Musafir Paswan 2003 GLHEL 17208. Mr. Gohil has also relied on the decision of the Hon''ble Supreme Court in the case of Nagappa V. Gurudayal Singh and Ors. 2003 (1) G.L.H. 225.

4.

From the facts and circumstances of the case, it is found that the claimants did not amend the claim amount even when the final award was passed and one third deduction from the notional income of the deceased in my view is right since the claimants are the parents. Hence, the view taken by the Tribunal is just and proper. No interference is called for. The appeal is therefore, dismissed.