High CourtsSingle Bench(2002) 04 GUJ CK 0051

Nanubhai Vithalbhai Vaghani vs State of Gujarat and Others

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 30 April 2002

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jayant M. Patel, J
CASE NUMBER
Special Civil Application No. 1816 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 557 words

Jayant Patel, J.—Rule. Mr. I.M. Pandya, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 7 Mr. Shirish Joshi for respondent Nos. 3 and 6, Mr. G.M. Joshi for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 waive service of rule. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.

2.

The present petition is preferred by the petitioner for appropriate direction to the respondents-authority to hold the election of the members of the Managing Committee of Bhavnagar District Co-operative Bank Limited, respondent No. 3 herein.

3.

Mr. Mangukiya for the petitioner submitted that the term of the members of the Managing Committee has expired on 31-3-2002 and as per the provisions of the Act, the process of election must be started as early as possible, and hence, there was no reason not to proceed with the election. Mr. Mangukiya submitted that in spite of this, no steps are taken by the authority for holding the election, and therefore, he submitted that appropriate direction may be given to the authority for holding the election of the bank so that the democratic principles may be maintained.

4.

On behalf of the respondents-Bank, Mr. Joshi submitted that the bye-laws of the bank are already amended and as the result thereof, the members of the Savarkundla Taluka are excluded for the purpose of participating in the election of the members of the Managing Committee. However, Mr. Joshi submitted that the question of amendment of the bye-laws is taken up in revision by the Joint Registrar and the matter is pending. Mr. Joshi submitted that there is no objection on the part of the bank in holding the election as per the existing bye-laws of the society. On behalf of the State Government and the election authority, Mr. I.M. Pandya learned A.G.P. has also submitted that there is no objection in holding the election as per the existing bye-laws of the society.

5.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and more particularly in view of the provisions of Section 145(c) of the Act, I am of the opinion that it is obligatory on the part of the authority to initiate the process for holding the election of the members of the Managing Committee of a specified co-operative society and to complete the same one month prior to the expiry of the statutory term. There is no dispute on the point that the statutory term of the members of the Managing Committee has expired on 31-3-2002. Considering the fact that the term was to expired on 31-3-2002, it is obligatory on part of the authorities to hold election to initiate the process and to hold election and to complete the same prior to one month from the date of expiry of the statutory term. However, no steps are taken, and therefore, J find it proper to give direction to the Deputy Collector who is a election authority to initiate the process of election and to hold the election of the Managing Committee of respondent No. 3-Bank as per existing bye-laws of the society on the basis of the voters'' list existing on 31-3-2002 and the said election must be completed within a period of three months from today.

6.

Petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. Direct service permitted.