High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 07 MAD CK 0015

Nanjundier and Another vs T. Venkata Rao and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 20 July 1910 · Citation: 7 Ind. Cas. 797

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallis, J · Krishnaswami Aiyar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 104 words
1.

The appeal ought to have been presented u/s 588 of the Civil Procedure Code. We allow the heading to lie amended and hear it under that

section. We think that in this case the plaintiff could not have obtained all the reliefs he sought for without asking for a declaration. The decision in

Ramachandrier v. Nur Mukammad Noorullah Sahib 30 M. 101 : 1 M.L.T. 314 : 16 M.L.J. 477, therefore, does not apply. We allow the appeal

and direct the lower Court to re-place the case on its file and dispose of it according to law.

2.

Costs will abide the result.