High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 08 DEL CK 0220

Nanak Chand @ Rohit vs Vinod Kumar and Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 29 August 2011 · Citation: (2012) 2 TAC 47

HON’BLE JUDGES
Indermeet Kaur, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MAC Appeal No. 777 of 2011 and CM No. 16095 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 406 words

Indermeet Kaur, J.

CM No. 16095/2011 (delay) in MAC APPEAL No. 777/2011

In view of the averments made in the application, the delay of 97 days is condoned in filing the appeal.

Application is disposed of.

MAC APPEAL No. 777/2011

1.

Award impugned before this Court is the Award dated 27.01.2011 vide which a token compensation in the sum of Rs. 2,24,546/- had been awarded to the claimant. The claimant was the father of a 13 year old child who had suffered an accident on 20.05.2005. Disability certificate produced in evidence was proved as Ex.PX; the injured had suffered a disability to the extent of 90% with respect to the left upper limb; the court had rightly noted that since the disability with respect to one hand which is on the left side; the total disability i.e. functional disability of the victim was computed at 50% of 90% i.e. 45%. There is No. dispute that since the victim was 13 year old child his notional income of Rs. 15,000 per annum had to be taken into account and correct multiplier of 15 had been applied. This amount equalized to Rs. 2,25,000/-; 45% of the same had been awarded as loss of future income i.e. Rs. 1,01,250/-; this calculation on No. ground suffers from any infirmity. Special amount had also been awarded under the non-pecuniary head i.e. Rs. 50,000/- under the head of "mental pain and agony" and another Rs. 50,000 towards physical disfigurement and loss of amenities of life"; the victim had remained in hospital for 20 days as per his own statement; Rs. 10,000/- as special diet; Rs. 10,000/- as conveyance charges; as also medical expense of Rs. 3,296/-which was in terms of medical bills produced of the government hospital were also the entitlement of the claimant; interest had also been awarded at 8; on this total sum of Rs. 2,24,546/-.

2.

Only contention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is that marriage prospect had not been accorded. Victim was a child of 13 years; various amounts awarded under the various heads as referred to above which include "loss of future of income", "physical disfigurement and loss of amenities to life" are all heads which have already taken care of this submission. No. separate amount is required to be awarded under this head; it will only overlap the aforenoted two heads.

3.

Impugned order in No. manners suffers from any infirmity; appeal is dismissed.