High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 11 DEL CK 2051

Naik Mohinder Lal (No-9078239) vs Union Of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 26 November 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Navin Chawla, J · Shalinder Kaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 16306/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 347 words

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 68744/2024

1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 16306/2024, CM APPL. 68745/2024

2.

By the present petition, the petitioner inter-alia prays for a restraint on the respondents from recovering any amount as damages from the petitioner by treating him as an unauthorised occupant of the Government quarter at Type-II, Quarter No. 723, Sector 1, RK Puram, New Delhi, for the period from 01.07.2021 to 06.09.2022.

3.

The petitioner further challenges Rule 43 of the Central Government General Pool Residential Accommodation Rules, 2017, to the extent that it restricts the period of retention of the General Pool Residential Accommodation at the last place of posting to a period of three years only in case of posting of Central Armed Police Force (in short, ‘CAPF’) personnel to a non-family station such as North-East Region and Jammu & Kashmir.

4.

In the petition, the petitioner claims that he made a representation to the respondents on 08.12.2022 against the provisional rent assessment report, which held that certain recovery of damages is to be made against the petitioner. The same has not been responded to till date, nor has any recovery been made from him till date. However, the petitioner apprehends that the respondents may one day start making the recovery of such damages from the petitioner.

5.

Having considered the contents of the petition, we direct the respondents to treat the present petition as a representation of the petitioner and to decide the same within a period of eight weeks from today. In case the decision of the respondents is adverse to the interest of the petitioner, no recovery shall be made from the petitioner for a period of at least four weeks from the communication of the order, and it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the same on all grounds that have been taken in the present petition or otherwise.

6.

We make it clear that presently, we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner.

7.

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.