Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1995) 11 SC CK 0169

Nahar Singh vs State of U.P. and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 28 November 1995 · Citation: (1996) 1 AD 87 : (1995) 9 JT 135 : (1995) 6 SCALE 773 : (1996) 1 SCC 434 : (1995) 5 SCR 754 Supp

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. B. Majmudar, J · K. Ramaswamy, J
RESULT
allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 558 of 1985

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 239 words
1.

Delay condoned. Substitution allowed.

2.

Notification u/s 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, "the Act") was published on June 25, 1974. Declaration u/s 6 was published on July 3, 1974 dispensing with the enquiry u/s 5-A after the Governor had exercised his power u/s 17(4) of the Act.

3.

It is not clear from the record that the possession of the land was taken after 15 days from the dale of service of the notice u/s 9 on the appellant. The appellant has asserted that he has been in possession of the land but no counter has been filed. In support thereof, the appellant has also placed on record the resolution dated December 27, 1977 of Gram Sabha stating that the other land has already been allotted to 30 eligible persons of the village and the land in question no longer is necessary. After the Amendment Act 68 of 1984 was brought into force w.e.f. September 24, 1984, Section 11A operates in the field. It envisages that if the award u/s 11 has not been made within two years from the date of corning into force of the Amendment Act, all the proceedings under Sections 4 and 6 shall stand lapsed. In view of the fact that no steps appeared to have been taken within time, the notification u/s 4(1) and declaration u/s 6 no longer subsist.

4.

Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. No costs.