High CourtsDivision Bench(1926) 09 MAD CK 0022

Nagoor Kanni Nadura vs Sithu Naick and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 September 1926 · Citation: (1927) 25 LW 43 : (1927) 52 MLJ 32

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jackson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 141 words

Jackson, J.—This case is not of much actual importance and this Court will not ordinarily interfere to set aside acquittals in petty assaults.

But it raises a point of law of some interest. Can an Appellate Court in order to test the substance of the evidence forming part of the judgment in a

case u/s 264, Criminal Procedure Code, call for such material as may exist outside the record, such as notes of evidence taken by the Presiding

Magistrate as in the present case? Considering that Section 264, Criminal Procedure Code, clearly lays down that the judgment shall be the only

record in such cases, it must be held that such additional matter cannot be called for or consulted. The Appellate Court therefore has based its

decision upon irrelevant matter; but, in the present case, there is no reason to interfere.