High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 10 MAD CK 0022

Nagajothi And Others vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Sivagnanam, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 17608 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 500 words

V.Sivagnanam, J

1.

The petitioners/A1 to A4, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 353 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.858 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant is that on 20.09.2023, when the defacto complainant made the contract work of laying roads, the accused persons came and threatened him and asked him to stop the work and thereafter, once again on 23.09.2023, the accused persons tried to prevent the contractor and the defacto complainant from laying the works and filthily abused him. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners are innocents persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, the learned counsel prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State would submit that the first accused is having two previous cases, the second accused is having five previous cases and no previous case is pending as against the accused Nos.3 and 4. Hence, the learned Government Advocate strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions:

6.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that :

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the trial Court as and when required for the purpose of interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.