High CourtsDivision Bench(1912) 08 MAD CK 0101

Nachiappa Goundan vs Ponnusamy Naicker

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 August 1912 · Citation: 17 Ind. Cas. 293 : (1912) 23 MLJ 287

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallis, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 209 words

Wallis, J.—The Additional District Munsif''s Court at Salem passed an order u/s 182 of Act XIV of 1882 (Order XVI Rule 4 of Act V of 1908) for payment of batta which is recoverable as in execution under Rule 13 of Order XVI of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2.

The petition in execution was transferred to the Principal District Munsiff''s Court. Subsequently the party against whom the order had been made died and a suit was filed in the same Court against his legal representative who appeared and objected that the matter was one for execution and that u/s 50 of the CPC he could only be brought in by the Court that passed the order. The District Munsif u/s 47 of the CPC decided to treat the suit as an execution petition and the legal representative as a party to it and proceeded to make an order against him. I agree with the District Judge that this was wrong as the legal representative had not been brought in u/s 50 C.P.C. and the fact that he appeared and objected to the suit and to the right of the Court to bring him in shows that he never waived his right.

3.

The petitions are dismissed with costs.