High CourtsDivision Bench(1916) 01 CAL CK 0021

Nabadip Chandra Nandi and Others vs The Secretary of State for India in Council

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 3 January 1916 · Citation: 33 Ind. Cas. 968

HON’BLE JUDGES
Imam, J · Herbert Holmwood, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 183 words
1.

We are of opinion that this Rule must be made absolute on the ground on which it was issued. In the first place, there was no summons upon any body to produce the documents and, therefore, Order XVI, Rule 10, did not apply, and secondly, if Order XVI, Rule 10, did apply, the procedure laid down in that rule was not followed, and until it was followed, no order under Rule 12 could possibly be made. The Civil Courts, and particularly the peripatetic Settlement Courts which cause a large amount of disturbance to local interests, cannot be too careful to follow the provisions of law strictly as regards summoning persons and documents before them. It appears to us that the proceedings of the Assistant Settlement Officer and the Settlement Officer affirming them were wholly without jurisdiction and must be set aside; and if the Assistant Settlement Officer requires any documents from the petitioners he must proceed strictly in accordance with law.

2.

The Rule is made absolute with costs to the petitioners, two gold mohurs. The fine, if paid, must be refunded.