High CourtsSingle Bench(2006) 04 OHC CK 0057

N. Simanchal Reddy vs State of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 17 April 2006 · Citation: (2006) CLT 797 (Suppl Crl)

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.S. Naidu, J
CASE NUMBER
TRP Criminal No. 6 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 308 words

A.S. Naidu, J.—This is an application u/s 407(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to transfer S.C. Nos. 6 of 2000 and 7 of 2000 arising out of G.R. Case No. 157 of 1998 from the Court of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Berhampur to any other Sessions Judge of the neighbouring district or any other Sessions Judge of the same district mainly on the ground that the Petitioner would not get fair and impartial trial from the Presiding Officer of the said Court, namely, Shri B.N. Jena.

2.

In the petition several instances have been cited to show that the orders passed by the said Presiding Officer were tainted with bias, and as justification for the aforesaid apprehension of the Petitioner. It is also alleged that certain orders passed by the said Presiding Officer were erroneous. But then the allegation that some orders passed by a Presiding Officer are not just and proper cannot be a ground for transfer of a case from the concerned Court to another. If a Court commits any mistake that can be rectified by Higher Court and that is why the hierarchy of Courts exists. The other allegations made against the Presiding Officer concerned also do not make out a ground for transfer of the cases.

3.

Be that as it may, in the meanwhile the then Presiding Officer of the Court concerned has already been transferred. Thus the apprehension of the Petitioner no more exists. In the aforesaid changed circumstance, this TRPCRL has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. As a consequence, the interim orders passed by this Court stand vacated. As the G.R. Case was of the year 1998 and the Sessions Cases are of the year 2000, this Court directs the Court below to dispose of the said Sessions Cases as expeditiously as possible.

Ordered accordingly.