High Courts(1891) 11 MAD CK 0010

N. Rama Row vs Xavier Restov Fernand

Madras High Court · Decided on 24 November 1891 · Citation: (1892) 2 MLJ 217

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 148 words
1.

The date of the decree of the Sub-Collector was 16th December 1889. The time allowed for appeal was one month. Appellant applied for

copy on 17th December. There is nothing to show when the stamp papers were called for, but assuming that they were called for on the 18th

December and deposited on 14th January, the appeal would be just in time. Following Mahadevi v. Vikrama I. L R 14 M 372, we are of opinion

that the time for obtaining copy should be excluded. Moreover the Acting District Judge on the 1st March 1890, excused the delay in presentation

as he was entitled to do, (see Reference under Forest Act V of ILR 1882 M 210) and admitted the appeal. We set aside the decree of the District

Judge and remand the appeal to be heard and determined on its merits. Costs to follow the result.