High CourtsDivision Bench(1911) 01 MAD CK 0029

Muthusawmi Pillay vs Govindasawmi Pillay

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 January 1911 · Citation: 9 Ind. Cas. 267

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ralph Benson, J · Munro, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 80 words
1.

We think that, although Exhibit B may not contain words of conveyance, that document should be enforced as having been executed in

settlement of a bona fide family dispute between the parties. Vide Ram Niranjan Singh v. Prayag Singh 8 C. 138 where the law relating to such

settlements is dealt with. We, therefore, set aside the decree of the Subordinate Judge and restore the decree of the District Munsif with costs in

this and the lower appellate Courts.