High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 10 MAD CK 0082

Muthumayakkal, & Anr. vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai Divn.I) Ltd

Madras High Court · Decided on 9 October 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.R.Swaminathan
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
902 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 298 words
1.

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the claimants. One Ravichandran died in an accident. The bus belonging to the respondent corporation was admittedly involved in the accident. Crime No.439/2007 was registered on the file of the Chekkanoorani Police Station against the bus driver under section 304(A) of Indian Penal Code. The claimants filed the said MCOP under Section 163(A) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Therefore they were not obliged to establish negligence on the part of the offending vehicle. After taking the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.2,250/-, the multiplier of 11 was adopted. The loss of income was quantified at Rs.2,97,000/-. However, the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the deceased was also guilty of contributory negligence which led to the accident. Therefore, the loss of income was slashed by 50% and arrived at Rs.1,48,500/-. A sum of Rs.1,78,500/- was finally awarded to be paid to the claimants. Aggrieved by the same, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed.

2.

The learned counsel for the claimants contended that the claimants adduced oral as well as documentary evidence. It was an application filed under Section 163(A) of the Act. On the side of the respondent corporation no evidence was let in. Therefore, the Tribunal could not have come to the conclusion that the deceased was also guilty of contributory negligence. Without any evidence adduced by the corporation, the Tribunal could not have come to such a finding.

3.

Therefore, I find force in the said submission of the learned counsel for the appellants. In other aspects, the damages awarded by the Tribunal are confirmed. The compensation payable to the appellants would now be Rs.1,78,500+1,48,500/- = Rs.3,27,000/-. In all other respects, the award passed by the Tribunal is confirmed. This appeal is allowed. No costs.