High CourtsDivision Bench(1920) 02 MAD CK 0037

Muthu Hengsu vs Netravathi Naiksavi

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 February 1920 · Citation: 58 Ind. Cas. 383 : (1920) 12 LW 44

HON’BLE JUDGES
Seshagiri Aiyar, J · Oldfield, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 132 words
1.

We agree with the find, logs of the lower Appellate Court except as to the profits which accorder before the assignment of 20th July 1915. Section 8 of the Transfer of Property Act provides that on a transfer of property, the legal incidents of the transferor''s interest, which are to pass, shall include the rents and profits due after the transfer. In Kocharla Seetamma v. Pillala Venkatarammanayya 21 lnd Cas. 387 it was held that a transfer of a claim to pass profits was invalid: and this is in accordance with English authority: Defrres v. Milie (1918) 1 Ch. D 98 .

2.

We must, therefore, allow the appeal, reduce the amount decreed by Rs. 62, and confirm the decree in other respects. Parties will pay: and receive proportionate costs throughout.