High CourtsDivision Bench(1917) 07 MAD CK 0006

Muthia Naik and Others vs Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 July 1917 · Citation: AIR 1918 Mad 413 : 43 Ind. Cas. 592

HON’BLE JUDGES
William Ayling, J · Sadasiva Aiyar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 82 words
1.

Petitioner''s Vakil contends that the composition of an offence u/s 345 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with one of several accused persons

has the effect of an acquittal of all the accused persons. We can find nothing in the section to support this interpretation and if this is really the

meaning of the learned Judges in Chandra Kumar Das v. Emperor 7. C.W.N. 176, we must respectfully dissent. No other authority is quoted by

petitioner.

2.

The petition is dismissed.