High CourtsDivision Bench(1917) 07 MAD CK 0031

Muthia Naick and Others vs The King-Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 July 1917 · Citation: (1918) ILR (Mad) 323

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sadasiva Ayyar, J · Ayling, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 83 words
1.

Petitioners'' vakil contends that the composition of an offence u/s 345 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with one of several accused persons has the effect of an acquittal of all the accused persons. We can find nothing in the section to support this interpretation and if this is really the meaning of the learned Judges in Chandra Kumar Das v. The Emperor 7 C.W.N. 176, we must respectfully dissent. No other authority is quoted by petitioner.

2.

The petition is dismissed.