High CourtsSingle Bench(1909) 10 MAD CK 0054

Muthia Nadar vs David Nadar and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 October 1909 · Citation: 5 Ind. Cas. 756

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sankaran Nair, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 97 words

Sankaran Nair, J.—The fact that the defendant signed the account kept by the plaintiff does not necessarily show that he thereby acknowledged there was a debt due. The entry must show that the defendant by his signature acknowledged that a debt was due by him otherwise it would only be an acknowledgment of the correctness of the figures entered therein. The account-book is not in this Court. I, therefore, set aside the decree, direct the Subordinate Judge to restore the suit to his file and dispose of it according to law. The costs will abide the result.