High CourtsDivision Bench(1901) 03 MAD CK 0017

Muthayya vs Venkataratnam and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 5 March 1901 · Citation: (1902) ILR (Mad) 553

HON’BLE JUDGES
Davies, J · Boddam, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 64 words
1.

We think the decree of the District Judge is right. The document on which the plaintiff relies was really a petition for withdrawal and was

stamped only as such.

2.

If it is to be relied upon as proof of his case by the plaintiff, it requires to be registered u/s 17 of the Registration Act. The second appeal is

dismissed with costs.