High Courts(1906) 08 MAD CK 0003

Muthan Chetty vs Ramaswamy Chetty and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 August 1906 · Citation: (1906) 16 MLJ 550

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 154 words
1.

We are of opinion that the husband''s brother has a better right to the certificate than the sister''s son.

2.

If the property in question was the property of the deceased husband it passes to the husband''s heirs. If it was the widow''s stridhanam, and if

she left no issue, it passes to the husband''s heirs if the marriage was in one of the approved forms. See Thayammal v. Annamalai Mudali (1895)

M.p. 35 and the judgment of the Privy Council in Mussumat Thakoor Debhee v. Rai Baluk Ram (1866) 11 M.I.A. 139. In the absence of

evidence to the contrary there is a presumption that, a marriage was in one of the approved forms.

3.

We set aside the order of the District Judge and direct that the certificate issue to Muthan Chetty, the husband''s brother, with costs throughout.

Note : - Cf. Ganeshi v. Ajudhia I.L.R(1906) A. 345 : - Ed.