High CourtsDivision Bench(1907) 06 BOM CK 0001

Mustafa Rahim vs Motilal Chunilal

Bombay High Court · Decided on 27 June 1907 · Citation: (1907) 9 BOMLR 742

HON’BLE JUDGES
Heaton, J · Chandavarkar, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Application for Revision No. 44 of 1907

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 181 words

Curiam, J.—The District Magistrate dismissed the complaint u/s 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code for reasons mainly or largely arising out of his own personal knowledge of the affair or conjecture or out of knowledge he had apparently acquired prior to the making of the complaint. Reasons for dismissing a complaint should be based on inferences or facts arising from or disclosed by (1) the complaint; (2) the examination of the complainant; (3) the investigation, if" any, made under the powers conferred by Section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This provides a wide field. Anything outside it is extra judicial and must be discarded. This conclusion coincides with that arrived at in the case of Ganesh Narayan Sathe ILR (1889) 13 Bom. 590.

2.

Accordingly we set aside the District Magistrate''s order and direct him to dispose of the complaint according to law.

3.

The matter was referred to inf''argument but we do not think it necessary at this stage to express any opinion as to whether the proceedings are bound by Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.