High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 UK CK 0142

Mustafa vs Deputy Director/Conservator Of Forest, Rajaji Tiger Reserve, Dehradun

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 352 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 226 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner was allotted an agricultural plot under “Gujjar Punarvas Yojna’. The said patta has now been cancelled on a complaint made by one Mrs. Jamila, in which it is alleged that petitioner has fraudulently transferred the land allotted to him, by means of an unregistered document.

2.

In this writ petition, petitioner has contended that petitioner was not heard before cancelling the patta.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to an objection, which petitioner allegedly filed before Deputy Director/Conservator of Forest, Rajaji Tiger Reserve, Dehradun, on 07.02.2022.

4.

After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer and submits that Deputy Director, Rajaji Tiger Reserve, Dehradun may be directed to consider petitioner’s objection and pass appropriate order.

5.

Learned Brief Holder for the State has no objection, if the prayer made by petitioner’s counsel is granted.

6.

Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Director, Rajaji Tiger Reserve, Dehradun to consider petitioner’s objection and take appropriate decision, as per law, within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Till decision on objection, the standing crop on the plot in question, if any, shall not be damaged.

7.

It goes without saying that Mrs. Jamila shall also be heard by Deputy Director, before taking any decision.