High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 01 MAD CK 0019

Murugesan vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 27990 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 390 words

C.V.Karthikeyan, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.11.2023, for the offences registered under Section 5 of Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882, Sections 35, 35B Act 6 Section 40G and Sections 44 and 49 of the Wild Life Protection Act 1972, Section 49B of Act VA and Section 51 of Act VB, in STOR No.2 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 3 pieces of red wood, 6 numbers of red wood stems, 12 small pieces of sandal wood and 2 number of deer horns, worth about Rs.2,00,000/-.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner is a Siddha Doctor and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.It is stated by the learned Government Advocate that there is no previous case against the petitioner.

5.Taking all these factors into consideration and also considering the period of incarceration and the investigation has been practically completed, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallipattu, and on further conditions that:-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.